THE RESEARCH BEHIND THE SOLUTION

Validated. Cross-Cultural. Deployable.

Developed through iterative validation across European and U.S. populations — over 1,400 participants across multiple studies. CRI has been validated against established clinical instruments including the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, Kessler K-6, PHQ-4, and WHO-5. The core construct replicates across cultures — a prerequisite for cross-jurisdictional deployment.

AUC .74–.82 for classifying elevated risk of burnout, anxiety, psychological distress, depression, and poor mental well-being. The cognitive risk score was the strongest single predictor in every model tested — outperforming age, sex, income, job level, tenure, and pre-existing health conditions. CRI explained 13–26% of outcome variance beyond what demographic and occupational variables captured alone.

In a study of 147 U.S. insurance claimants, the cognitive patterns CRI measures were the only statistically significant predictor of how claimants experienced and evaluated the claims process — after controlling for age, gender, socioeconomic status, event severity, perceived injustice, and emotional distress. The pattern that shapes how people engage with a claim is measurable at intake.

Non-clinical. No diagnosis. Psychometric assessment designed from the ground up for operational insurance environments — claims intake, case triage, return-to-work planning — without triggering clinical governance, HIPAA, ADA, or GINA frameworks.

1,400+ study participants · AUC .74–.82 · Cross-cultural validation (EU + U.S.) · Non-clinical, non-diagnostic design.

A conservative reading of the literature would say: the scientific rationale for using psychosocial constructs as predictors of claim complexity is well-established, and the operational hypothesis is promising. References furnished upon request.